Article

Sexual Abuse and the Third Secret of Fatima

Vital Relevance of Fatima

You may well be wondering: How do these cases of clergy sexual abuse/pastoral negligence have anything to do with Fatima? Well, do you recall what Benedict XVI stated back in 2010? “One would be deceiving himself to think that Fatima’s prophetic mission is complete.” He uttered those words on May 13; two days prior, while en route to Fatima, he uttered even more explosive words in response to an equally controversial question, one directly related to clergy sexual abuse.

On May 11, 2010, during the flight to Portugal, Benedict fielded a small number of pre-selected questions from the media that were presented to him by Fr. Federico Lombardi, S.J., then-Director of the Holy See Press Office. The third and final series of questions reads as follows:

“… Your Holiness, what meaning do the Fatima apparitions have for us today? In June 2000, when you presented the text of the third secret in the Vatican Press Office, a number of us and our former colleagues were present. You were asked if the message could be extended, beyond the attack on John Paul II, to other sufferings on the part of the Popes. Is it possible, to your mind, to include in that vision the sufferings of the Church today for the sins involving the sexual abuse of minors?” [emphasis added]

Here, in part, was Benedict’s explosive answer:

“… In 2000, in my presentation, I said that an apparition – a supernatural impulse which does not come purely from a person’s imagination but really from the Virgin Mary, from the supernatural – that such an impulse enters into a subject and is expressed according to the capacities of that subject. … Consequently, I would say that, here too, beyond this great vision of the suffering of the Pope, which we can in the first place refer to Pope John Paul II, an indication is given of realities involving the future of the Church, which are gradually taking shape and becoming evident. So it is true that, in addition to moment [sic] indicated in the vision, there is mention of, there is seen, the need for a passion of the Church, which naturally is reflected in the person of the Pope, yet the Pope stands for the Church and thus it is sufferings of the Church that are announced. The Lord told us that the Church would constantly be suffering, in different ways, until the end of the world. … As for the new things which we can find in this message today, there is also the fact that attacks on the Pope and the Church come not only from without, but the sufferings of the Church come precisely from within the Church, from the sin existing within the Church. This too is something that we have always known, but today we are seeing it in a really terrifying way: that the greatest persecution of the Church comes not from her enemies without, but arises from sin within the Church, and that the Church thus has a deep need to relearn penance, to accept purification, to learn forgiveness on the one hand, but also the need for justice. Forgiveness does not replace justice.” [emphasis added]

Although he did not give a simple “yes” in response, Benedict clearly implied an affirmative answer to the question concerning “the sufferings of the Church today for the sins involving the sexual abuse of minors”. By emphasizing that the Third Secret concerns “the future of the Church”, and more specifically, “a passion of the Church” resulting “from sin within the Church” that is manifesting itself “today…in a really terrifying way”, Benedict unmistakably affirmed that the Third Secret deals with much more than a failed assassination attempt. (The idea that anyone familiar with the facts and in their right mind could buy such an absurd explanation is both insulting and comical.)

Yet Benedict’s lengthy answer in 2010 begs a further question: Where in Sister Lucia’s description of the vision do we see anything about “sin within the Church”? Simply put, there is no indication of it whatsoever, which obviously means, in the words of Mother Angelica, that “we didn’t get the whole thing.”

The Third Secret Speaks of Apostasy

Thankfully, due to the testimony of several key witnesses and scholars – and the efforts of men like Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari (may they rest in peace), who worked tirelessly to spread this crucial testimony – we know the substance of Our Lady’s still-hidden words, which can be summarized by a single word: apostasy. Here is a brief sampling of the testimony to that effect, most of which can be found in Volume 3 of The Whole Truth About Fatima by Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité:

  • “I cannot say anything of what I learned at Fatima concerning the third Secret, but I can say that it has two parts: one concerns the Pope. The other, logically – although I must say nothing – would have to be the continuation of the words: In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved.”[emphasis added] – Fr. Joseph Schweigl, S.J., d. 1964 (interrogated Sister Lucia about the Third Secret on behalf of Pope Pius XII on Sept. 2, 1952)
  • In the period preceding the great triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, terrible things are to happen. These form the content of the third part of the Secret. What are they?

If ‘in Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved,’ … it can be clearly deduced from this that in other parts of the Church these dogmas are going to become obscure or even lost altogether.

Thus it is quite possible that in this intermediate period which is in question (after 1960 and before the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary), the text makes concrete references to the crisis of the Faith of the Church and to the negligence of the pastors themselves.” [emphasis added] – Fr. Joaquin Alonso, C.M.F., d. 1981 (Cleratian priest and official Fatima archivist for over sixteen years; had unparalleled access to Sister Lucia)

  • The Secret of Fatima speaks neither of atomic bombs, nor nuclear warheads, nor Pershing missiles, nor SS-20’s. Its content concerns only our faith. To identify the Secret with catastrophic announcements or with a nuclear holocaust is to deform the meaning of the message. The loss of faith of a continent is worse than the annihilation of a nation; and it is true that faith is continually diminishing in Europe.” [emphasis added] – Bishop Alberto Cosme do Amaral, d. 2005 (former bishop of Fatima-Leiria; remarks made in Vienna, Austria on Sept. 10, 1984)
  • “It [the Third Secret] has nothing to do with Gorbachev. The Blessed Virgin was alerting us against apostasy in the Church.” [emphasis added] – Cardinal Silvio Oddi, d. 2001 (Vatican diplomat and personal friend of Pope John XXIII, from whom he knew certain details concerning the Third Secret)
  • “In the Third Secret it is foretold, among other things, that the great apostasy in the Church will begin at the top.” [emphasis added] – Cardinal Mario Luigi Ciappi, O.P., d. 1996 (personal theologian to Popes John XXIII–John Paul II)

But perhaps the most compelling testimony of all is that of Sister Lucia herself, who related the following to Fr. Augustine Fuentes during a Dec. 26, 1957 interview:

Father, the devil is in the mood for engaging in a decisive battle against the Blessed Virgin. And the devil knows what it is that offends God the most, and which in a short space of time will gain for him the greatest number of souls. Thus the devil does everything to overcome souls consecrated to God, because in this way the devil will succeed in leaving the souls of the faithful abandoned by their leaders, thereby the more easily will he seize them.

That which afflicts the Immaculate Heart of Mary and the Heart of Jesus is the fall of religious and priestly souls. The devil knows that religious and priests who fall away from their beautiful vocation drag numerous souls to hell. … The devil wishes to take possession of consecrated souls. He tries to corrupt them in order to lull to sleep the souls of laypeople and thereby lead them to final impenitence. He employs all tricks, even going so far as to suggest the delay of entrance into religious life. Resulting from this is the sterility of the interior life, and among the laypeople, coldness (lack of enthusiasm) regarding the subject of renouncing pleasures and the total dedication of themselves to God.

… Hence from now on we must choose sides. Either we are for God or we are for the devil. There is no other possibility.” [emphasis added]

Apostasy and Moral Corruption

Once again, you might be asking: What does apostasy (loss of faith) have to do with clergy sexual abuse? More than we might think, precisely because purity of faith and purity of heart (and, ultimately, of conduct) are profoundly interrelated. St. Augustine of Hippo (A.D. 354-430) touches upon this truth at the end of his treatise On Faith and the Creed (Ch. 10, 25), where he explains:

“This is the faith which in few words is given in the Creed to Christian novices, to be held by them. And these few words are known to the faithful, to the end that in believing they may be made subject to God; that being made subject, they may rightly live; that in rightly living, they may make the heart pure; that with the heart made pure, they may understand that which they believe.” [emphasis added]

If our minds are not subject to God through “obedience to the faith” (Rom. 1:5; cf. 16:26), then our wills inevitably stray from following the dictates of His law. And vise versa, if we choose to commit grave sins – especially sins of the flesh – and thus form a deep-seated habit of sin, our interest in the truths of Faith will eventually be snuffed out, just as “the end of the commandment” – that is, the result of keeping God’s law – “is charity from a pure heart, and a good conscience, and an unfeigned faith” (1 Tim. 1:5). By choosing to sin, we become “lovers of pleasure more than of God: Having an appearance indeed of godliness but denying the power thereof” (2 Tim. 3:4-5) – namely, the power of grace to change sinful behavior.

Does this not fittingly describe men like Cardinal McCarrick, those who have lived for decades with “an appearance of godliness” which was, in fact, a rather thin veneer covering a disgusting habit of unnatural vice?

“The Secret, It’s Terrible”

Let us recall once more the words of Benedict XVI,

“that the greatest persecution of the Church comes not from her enemies without, but arises from sin within the Church, and that the Church thus has a deep need to relearn penance, to accept purification, to learn forgiveness on the one hand, but also the need for justice. Forgiveness does not replace justice.”

“Be not deceived,” St. Paul warns us, “God is not mocked” (Gal. 6:7). And likewise, “Revenge is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord” (Rom. 12:19; cf. Deut. 32:35). The abominable crimes of men like Cardinal McCarrick – sins which are overwhelmingly homosexual in nature and cry to Heaven for vengeance – will not go unpunished. The frightening reality, though, is that the chastisement for such sins impacts the entire Mystical Body of Christ and the world at large.

With this in mind, let us reflect on one final piece of evidence concerning the Third Secret and its contents. It is found in a book written by Frère François des Marie des Anges, a confrere of Frère Michel, and relates to Cardinal Albino Luciani, who reigned for a mere 33 days as Pope John Paul I (Aug. 26-Sept. 28, 1978):

In 1977, to celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, Cardinal Albino Luciani led a group of about fifty Italians from Venice to the Cova da Iria, among whom there were about a dozen priests. They went to the Carmel of Coimbra on July 11The Patriarch of Venice, the future Pope John Paul I, celebrated Mass in the Convent Chapel. Then, on Sister Lucy’s request, he conversed with her for almost two hours. At the end of that interview, ‘the Cardinal appeared very pale, to the extent of leaving an impression on those individuals who were present.

The photographs taken of him a few months later, in the beginning of the year 1978, when he preached on Lent in his native land, show him again ‘with an expression which was not habitual to him, extremely serious.’ During that sojourn, his brother and sister-in-law, Edoardo and Antonietta Luciani, perceived that the Cardinal was strangely absorbed, pensive, and inscrutable. ‘One evening,’ relates Regina Kummer in her biography of John Paul I, ‘during dinner, Antonietta suddenly noticed his extreme and anguished pallor. He excused himself and without giving further explanations, he took his breviary and withdrew into his bedroom. The same thing happened the next evening. As a good hostess, she asked him if the food was the cause of his discomfort. The Cardinal answered them: I was just thinking of what Sister Lucy told me at Coimbra.

Then he added: The Secret, it’s terrible.

Read more at Catholic Family News