This is a supplemental follow-up to my 2/28/2024 Catholic365 article The Unconscionable Pastoral Malpractice of Fiducia Supplicans
It continues to amaze and sadden me to see the gullibility of many people who defend Fiducia Supplicans and accept at face value the bogus claims within the document and those made elsewhere by Cardinal Fernandez and others that the document and what it authorizes ‘do not violate Church teaching on marriage, nor does the document tacitly accept in any way same sex couples living together in a Satanic mockery of true marriage between a man and a woman.’
The gullibility regarding Fiducia Supplicans comes in many forms.
Some people actually claim that because the document and Fernandez make statements that it does not do X, therefore it doesn’t do X despite the reality that stands in stark contrast to the claims.
Others claim that the document is ambiguous in part, and so all it needs is some additional clarifications and it will be just fine.
Still others gullibly emphasize that since the document ‘makes very clear’ that such a blessing of people in ‘irregular unions cannot be joined to any sort of ritual’ or take place in a formal Church setting…in order to avoid possibly confusing people about what the Church teaches regarding marriage, that, too, makes it a legitimate action. Alas, this red herring fools many who obtusely accept the notion that since these blessings are not to take place in a more formal Church setting, this makes them okay or at least more acceptable.
But I don’t care nor should anyone else care if the blessings take place in a closet (as ironic as that might be) or anywhere else in the universe. It is the blessing itself in any setting that is the most serious problem because it does in fact do what defenders of the document obtusely claim it does not do: it blesses the couple who come for the blessing precisely as an active same sex couple and not as two individuals who are just pals stopping by for a blessing as individuals.
Continue reading at Catholic 365
Related Posts
- Pope Leo Appoints Bishop Who Backed Same-Sex Blessings
- Cardinal Marx Reconfirmed in the Curia, Despite Challenging Rome with Homosexual Blessings
- Algiers Cardinal: Blessing Same-Gender Couples ‘Changes Everything’
- German Priests To Cardinal Marx: Homosexual Blessing Guidance Creates A Loyalty Conflict
- Parolin Avoids Speaking About Sanctions Against German Bishops for Homosexual Blessings
- Vatican I and Gay Blessings Are Negotiable for the Schismatic Orthodox
- Rome’s Complicity In Blessing of Homosexual Couples
- Woman Heading German Catholic Committee Defends Homosexual Blessings
- DIALOGUE for Sodomite Supporters – EXCOMMUNICATION for Traditionalists
- SSPX Responds To Rome’s Surrender On Homosexual Blessings
- Leo Affirms Francis’ Blessing Of Gay Couples
- Asked About Homosexual Blessings, Leo Says Other Issues Will Take Priority
- Leo’s Evasive Response to Marx’s Homosexual Blessings
- Cardinal Marx Expands Gay Blessings, Defying Vatican Line
- Timothy Radcliffe Annoyed by Those Who Label Him a Progressive
- Betrayal at the Altar: Trans Marriages and Queer Traditions in a Crumbling Church
- Two Years After Fiducia Supplicans
- The REAL Driving Force Behind Fiducia Supplicans
- Cardinal Sarah: Fiducia Supplicans ‘Threatens Unity Of The Church,’ Should Be ‘Forgotten’
- Bishop Bätzing Claims German Bishops Not On ‘Confrontational Course With Rome’
