Republished from Exsurge Domine
So by their fruits you will know them. Mt 7, 20
Premise
The crisis in the Church is naturally theological , not canonical. Not just that: this is not a crisis among many, but the crisis of the Authority, because it is precisely the Authority that is the subject of a subversion that for sixty years has not been imaginable within the Catholic Church. Yes, in effect, authority, when exercised for good, is certainly the most suitable instrument to ensure the good governance of the institution that presides, so it can also be transformed into an instrument equally effective at destroying it, at the moment when people flaunt it they break the bond of obedience to God, who is the supreme guarantor of authority.
This is what the Jacobins said in 1789, this is what the proponents of the conciliar revolution reprimanded in 1965: illegitimately appropriating the Authority to oblige their subjects to accept obedience to iniquitous orders, directed to a plan subversive. And both the Jacobins and the modernists looked forward not only to the active collaboration of their accomplices and the inaction of their cowardly men, but also to the consent of those who obeyed with good faith and for a mass progressively induced to accept any change in the name of obedience [2].
The idealization of authority
In recent weeks, “conservatives” such as Riccardo Cascioli, Luisella Scrosati, Daniele Trabucco and Giovanni Zanone have argued that lay people and clergy, faced with the crisis of the Catholic Church, should not adopt forms of resistance against the evils of the Superiors; There should be no questions about authority, since it emanates directly from Our Lord. They affirm that the indignity of an objector or of the Pope does not invalidate the legitimacy of his authority, but this can be certain in the case of a personal indignity which does not imply the exercise of the authority itself. However, authority cannot legitimately be exercised beyond the limits that have been given to it, much less against its own purposes or against the will of the divine Legislator. An object that knowingly cooperates with an injurious purpose with government acts invalidates the legitimacy of those acts and their authority, precisely because they are placed in fraudulent laws . [3]
The idealistic and disconnected vision of the reality of the cited authors, according to which the Authority will not lose its legitimacy nor will it be safe when its orders are directed to evil, makes evident the logical short circuit between the reality of the Popes and obispos herejes – formal or material, no matter: in In any case it is something unheard of – and the theory of an Authority is incomparable to the heresy and the evil intentions of those who flaunt this Authority.
A systemic crisis
Those who persist in playing individual things regardless of the evident consistency between them and the general image that emerges of them, falsify reality by giving it an engaging representation. This is a crisis that has lasted for sixty years, always in the same direction, always with the connivence of the Authority, always contradicting the same articles of the Fe and apoyating the same errors you condemn. Those responsible for this crisis are all united by the subversive desire to appropriate and maintain the power to achieve the objectives they propose. And as I know that the profound State and the profound Church act in a concerted form, just see how the architects of this subversion in the ecclesiastical field act in the form of their counterparts in the civil sphere, including referring to the lexico and the techniques of manipulation of masses. The evidence of the disastrous results obtained by the Popes and the conciliar obispos did not lead them to turn further and repair the damage caused, until, on the contrary, we were to continue obstinately along the same line, confirming the malice and premeditation, and decir, the mens rea . [4]
We find ourselves in a situation of serious institutional conflict, from which it emerges that the majority of the obispos constituted in authority – rather than doubts – act with the decisive and voluntary intention of committing illicit acts against the good of the Church and of others , conscious of their consequences. If they do not harbor the intention of doing evil, it is said, they will be of good faith, they will not persist in repeating the same mistakes, seeking the same results. They would also try to induce with all the means to the fiels and priests to deny what the Holy Church has taught during centuries, making them embrace what it condemned and punished with the most severe penalties.
La aceptación del fraude
Let us, then, have a complete prayer for obispos and traitorous Popes who claim not only the inert silence before the scandals of their brothers, but also the enthusiastic acceptance and sharing of this tradition, following that esoteric principle which embodies it Satanist Aleyster Crowley summarized the principles of the XX century as follows: “ The evil must hide from the light of the day, because the rules of the universe say that those who are committed are consistent in their own ”. This is the modus operandi of the devil and his servants, which we find confirmed by the narration of the temptations that Satan presents to Our Lord in the desert: «I will give everything to you », says the Evil One to Christ , «si te postras y me adoras» (Mt 4, 9). To pretend to be worshiped like God, Satan first places the acceptance of the fraud, and says, of the reward – All this I will give you – which is absolutely false, because Satan cannot renounce what does not belong to him.
Yes, absurdly, Our Lord was left behind Satan and worshiped him, he did not take away a grain of desert dust, and this truth would have turned out to be a fraud. Therefore, the Señor responds: « ¡Vete, Satanás! Because it is written: “Adorarás al Señor tu Dios, y solo a él rindorás worship” (ib., 10). With these words Our Lord reveals the identity of the temptation and his engaños. Also in Edén, tempting Eve, the Serpent had proposed to the first fathers who were converted to the safety of the gods (Gen 3, 5). They knew very well that Satan was not in a condition to convert them into Gods and that they tended to respond before God through their proud desobedience, but in light of this they allowed that the lie of the Evil One was certain, making themselves responsible for the subversion of Good and Evil and acting as God did not he was omnipotent and capable of punishing him. This, ultimately, is the ὕβρις , the pride that impels the man to desatiar God by choosing a sinful cometer, which holds as a consequence the νέμεσις, it is to decide, the inevitable punishment that strikes those who have violated the divine order by exceeding him impious limits by God.
The “Revelación del Método”
Historian and social engineering expert Michael A. Hoffman addressed the same topic from a different perspective, identifying an occult elite that uses manipulation techniques to control masses. Not only does he want to conquer power, but he wants to wage a psychological war that transforms reality into a magical, alchemical ritual (and this coincides with the words of Crowley). This elite does not hide it at all, until it deliberately reveals parts of its plan (after the Revelation of the Method ), as an act of humiliation of its subditos and affirmation of its supremacy. Social psychology studies confirm that this cruel game of subjugation and dominating the victims is needed to provoke cognitive disharmony , that is, the state of psychological distress that occurs when we encounter two affirmations or contradictory facts, as for example, occurs when the health authorities they affirmed, implying, that the experimental genetic substance was “ safe and effective ” but at the same time they raised the criminal shield for the inoculating doctors; or when we asked Jorge Bergoglio to decide that “ God is not catholic ”. This cognitive confusion, this perception of a contradiction in terms is deliberate, because it demoralizes us (we are aware of our impotence), because it leads us to an implicit consent (a passive consent, as in saying: “ I will show you what I am doing, and you can’t do anything, as far as I am concerned ”) and finally because it leads us to the acceptance of a despotic power (even if it is a mockery of the masses, strengthening the psychological control over us). [5]
The “cognitive dysonancy” and the “gaslighting” of conservatives
It should not surprise us, therefore, that these massive manipulation techniques are also used in the ecclesiastical sphere, to provoke the same cognitive disharmony in the galls, the same demoralisation, the same extorted consent, the same acceptance of the authority that makes us aware of contradiction, as long as obedience is required. We think about the paradox of Leon who declares religious freedom a human derecho on the basis of Vatican II and at the same time canonizes Blessed Bartolo Longo, who in his writings condemns religious indifferentism and the concept of religious freedom [6]; or who presides over ecumenical meetings with Muslims, but canonizes the Blessed Ignacio Choukrallah Maloyan, the Armenian obispo martyred by Muslims for denying themselves apostatizing from the true faith.
We must also be surprised that the New Brújula behaves exactly as predicted in these cases by the manuals of social psychology, obstinately denying the contradiction, however evident, in a true operation of gaslighting [7]: “ What you saw never happened ”. The use of videos or images generated by AI is also converted into a herramienta de destabilización, because it contributes to eroding the sensible basis of the knowledge of reality, making it impossible to distinguish the truth of the false and, therefore, avoiding the misconception of “real” to replace it by “likely”. The appearance is as dark as the place of the substance, only because it is transmitted to us by the image that appears on the mobile phone or on the computer, we do not know whether it seems certain to us, it is certain or it just seems so. How can I not see in this new phenomenon an attack on the one that Satan desapizes with his theatrical artifices and special effects the truth of God that is simple, without folds?
It deals with serious tests to prove devotion to the synodal religion , the same as occurs in the civil sphere with the religion of health or the green religion . And it is no different to ask those who accepted the Protestant Mission of Pablo VI to be allowed to attend the Tridentine Mission, which is the antithesis of the Novus Ordo . Including the “excommunion” that Jorge Bergoglio inflicted on me reveals an enormous contradiction: on the one hand, I was declared cismatic for denouncing the same errors that all the Popes since Pius XII have condemned; On the other hand, the true herejes and cismatics are admitted to communicatio in sacris with those who condemn me, without any canonical consequence. The message is clear: ” We can show you the contradiction between our words and our actions, and it won’t hurt anything. We will accept the lie as much as the idea of it .”
All accepted absurdity weakens the ability of discernment of the fieles and of the clergy, in order to be able to responsibly obey their pastors. If our belief is not strong and convincing, this leads us to a form of apathy that leads to new provocation. It is a form of ritual humiliation that does not work for you through the secret , even through flagrant ostentation , especially when obedience to the Authority is required by abusive orders and including criminals as a sacrifice of one’s own rationality , as a sacrifice of one ‘s will través of a perverted concept of authority and obedience . If the Authority of the Church, even at its highest levels, is responsible for this psychological manipulation of the fieles destined to perpetuate on its own power to demolish the Church, it is here that the priests and lay people must be looked after to be condemned to the guilt of such traición? Are these the same manipulators, established in Rome and in all the organs and institutions of the Catholic Church? It is not surprising that priestly vocations are desired and that many feelings resent or abandon religious practice. It is the desired and planned result of this cruel goteo.
The “master coup” of Satanás
The devil wants to obtain our adhesion to the evil not through the engaño, until we are encouraged to accept the lie with which he defines the evil as well, and accept the fiction by which we present the good as an evil. Satan’s master coup consists in this: to obtain from us an irrational feeling, even in the face of the evidence of fraud and subversion that we recognize as such but that, in an act of insane suicidal aniquilacion, we accept how the truths were divinely revealed. For the Catholic, faith is never irrational: rationabile sit obsequium vestrum , says San Pablo (Rom 12, 1), because God is the author of Faith and reason, and cannot have contradiction in the truth. Satan, on the contrary, to the lying man and father of lying (Jn 8, 44), cannot dissimulate his deeds through fraud, for which he demands of us not a rational adhesion , but a superstitious consent , an act of doing the opposite , in which the asent of the intellect to him Evident errors and herejías are not motivated by the authority of a true God, up to the usurpation of that authority by part of a rebellious and lying creature that we know that we would like to embarrass and lose ourselves. Satan wants us to abdicate our reason and sense of faith , transforming the act of faith into a local apostasy.
The absoluteness of obedience
Absolute obedience, freeing it from the necessary coherence that presupposes among all the requirements of the jerárquico body in which it is exercised[8], means taking into the hands of the vicarious authority of the jerarquia a power that the supreme legislator has never granted it , so to speak, the faculty of being able to legislate legitimately against the will of the Legislator himself and in perjuicio de los fieles. Here we are not talking about orders incidentally equivocated by individual obispos who abuse their authority in an ecclesiastical context where virtue is fostered and sin is condemned and punished. Here we are talking about a total jerárquico system that has been able – both in the Catholic Church and in public officials – to take control of power, obtaining the recognition and obedience of its subordinates through the use of coercive means.
Not only this: the absolute obedience to the authority also ends in being non-responsible : a convenient coartada offers to many, despised Don Abbondio with wrapped tunics or with clérigos , very careful not to disgust nadie, to “avoid polarizations” -following the Leon’s hope – to benefit from the favors of the powerful who know that they are unjust, but to those who are deprived of cowardice or interest.
Conclusion
The Holy Scripture, the Fathers, the mystics and my Lady Mary in Fátima have put us on guard against an apostasy that the Church will have to face in recent times. How can we think that this apostasy will materialize, if it is not through false pastors instead of good pastors, and through pseudo-Christs and false prophets instead of Christ and the Prophets? How could the elect be committed to herejes and cismáticos (Mt 24, 24), if not when they occupy positions of authority in the Church? But the Church is indefectible , repiten some with petulancia. And it really is: considering that the great majority of her enemies are enraged against her and act in acuerdo with the enemies of Christ. The Catholic Church is indefectible in the sense that it can never fail in its mission to safeguard and transmit the Truth revealed by God, it cannot lead to a definitive error in its Feity or its Moral. And this, of course, does not happen when a heretical and corrupt Jerarquía seeks to obscure or disfigure the sacred Depósito de la Fe . Let us not forget that the Church is not only the one that militates in this earth ( hic ) and today ( now ), but it is also the one that is penitent in Purgatory and triumphant in Heaven.
The celestial structure is the guarantee of the indefectibility that the divine Fundador promises and that the Holy Spirit assures it. And if the conciliar-synodal Church that today presents itself as militantly contradicts the ayer, breaking continuity and unity in the profession of the only one that makes it an apostolic one both in the flow of time and not only in its diffusion in space, it is not the same Church. Therefore, the Lord must not arouse a clamorous voice in the desert that breaks the wall of silence and complicity of the conspirators: I refer to the “doctors of the end of the times” mentioned by Augustin Lémann [9] in his thoughts on The Antichrist . The new Saints Athanasius were imprisoned, exiled, persecuted, but finally rewarded by divine justice with the proclamation of his sanctity. This is how the great objection of Alejandría and doctor of the Church was directed at the fieles during the great Arrian herejía [10]: ¡Que Dios les consuele! […] What enters […] is the fact that others have violently occupied the churches, while you are outside at this moment. It is a fact that they hold the seat, but they hold the apostolic faith. You can occupy our churches, but they are outside the true Fe. You remain outside the places of worship, but the faith lives in you. Let’s say: what is more important, the place or the Fe? The green Fe, above all. Who has lost and who has lost in this game, he who keeps the seat or he who observes the Fe? It is certain, buildings are good when the apostolic faith is preached in them; they are saints, if everything is raised in a holy way… We are those who are happy, those who remain within the Church for your Faith, who maintain signatures in the foundations as they have been entrusted to the Apostolic Tradition, and if some execrable jealous person intends to protect it on various occasions, he does not keep exit. They are the ones who have separated from her in the current crisis. Nadie will prevail against your Fe, beloved brothers, and we believe that God will someday devolve our churches. The more the violent men attempt to occupy the places of worship, the more they separate from the Church. They affirm that they represent the Church, but in reality they are the ones who have previously been expelled from it and are extravagant. Even if the Catholics who are loyal to Tradition are reduced to a punishment, they are the ones who are the true Church of Jesus Christ .
The recurring accusation that both conservatives and members of the Synod direct those who maintain firm faith and denounce their errors is that they want to create their own Church , separating themselves with the cism of the Catholic Church, visible and jerárquica, from which they have overcome the embargo with a real coup of the State and in which they claim to exercise legitimate authority for the purposes opuestos to whom Our Lord has entrusted them. But weren’t they, with their errors condemned by all the pre-conciliar Popes, the ones who created for themselves a parallel Church that contradicts the immutable and subordinate Magisterium of the Pope? How can a rebellious authority against Christ, Head of the Mystic Body, pretend to exercise the authority of Christ to contradict His Word? How can those who have separated from ecclesiastical communion with the true Roman Catholic Apostolic Church accuse those who remain bitter about it of this?
+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
24 October MMXXV
S.cti Raphaëlis Archangeli
NOTE
1 – The term auctoritas derives from the author , in the feeling of the author and guarantor referring to God.
2 – Saint Pío
3 – The expression in fraudulent law refers to a behavior or legal act carried out with the intention of eluding a rule, eluding its finality or application, even formally respecting its literality. It is clear that it concerns an action which, by apparently complying with the law , comes close to obtaining a result which the same law purports to prohibit or limit. The characteristics of this behavior are formal conformity , elusive intention and the effect contrary to the mind of the legislator.
4 – The mens rea designates the psychological component of the crime, i.e. the decision, the intention or the conciencia of violating the law.
5 – Hoffman writes: “ The alchemical principle of the Revelation of the Method has as its main component a joke of the victims, similar to that of a payaso, as a demonstration of power and macabre arrogance. It arouses no significant response to opposition or resistance from recipients, and is one of the most effective techniques of psychological warfare and mental violence .” Véase Michael A. Hoffman II, Secret societies and psychological warfare , 2001.
6 – Bartolo Longo wrote: Before God the man does not have true freedom of conscience, freedom of worship and freedom of thought, as we understand today, it is decided, the faculty of choosing a religion and a cult according to what is meant; up to the freedom of the gods of God, as San Pablo says, it is decided, the dejar el error and the seductions of the world to run freely to Heaven. To affirm, for that matter, that the man holds the right before God to think and believe in religion as plazca, is an error . Cf. Bartolo Longo, Saint Dominic and the Inquisition at the Tribunal of Reason and History , Valle de Pompeya, Escuela Editorial Bartolo Longo, 1888.
7 – Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person (or a group) makes someone (or a group) question their perception of reality, memory or strength, with the aim of controlling, debilitating or destabilizing the victim.
8 – No one can have true obedience if those who are constituted in authority in the Jerarquia require to be obeyed, but at the same time they desobey God, who is the guarantor and the source of the Authority. However, one can have legitimate authority if those who exercise it in the name of God do not consider themselves to be their supreme authority.
9 – Augustin Lémann, The Antichrist , Marietti, 1919, p. 53. ” The second champion of the Christian truth against the Antichrist will be a phalanx of Doctors raised by God in this time. […] This phalanx of Doctors will receive, for the defense and the advice of the good, a greater understanding of our Sacred Writings .” See https://www.rassegnastampa-totustuus.it/cattolica/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/LANTICRISTO-A-Lemann.pdf . Canon Augustin Lémann, a French youth, converted to Catholicism together with his brother Joseph. Habiéndose hecho amigos de Pio IX, ambos fueron consultores del Vaticano Concilio I.
10 – Saint Athanasius, Epistolæ festales , Carta XXIX, e
NOTE
1 – The term auctoritas derives from auctor , in the sense of author and guarantor referring to God.
2 – Saint Pius X reminded us that the success of the wicked is possible above all thanks to the laziness of the good.
3 – The expression in fraudem legis refers to a legal act or behavior carried out with the intention of circumventing a rule, evading its purpose or application, even while formally respecting its literal wording. In other words, it is an action that, while appearing to comply with the law , is carried out to obtain a result that the law itself intends to prohibit or limit. The characteristics of this behavior are formal conformity , the evasive intent , and the effect contrary to the legislator’s intent.
4 – The mens rea designates the psychological component of the crime, that is, the intention or awareness of violating the law.
5 – Hoffman writes: “ The alchemical principle of the Revelation of the Method has as its main component a mocking, clownish jeer of the victims, as a demonstration of power and macabre arrogance. When carried out in a veiled manner, accompanied by certain hidden signs and symbolic words, and does not elicit any significant response of opposition or resistance from the recipients, it is one of the most effective techniques of psychological warfare and mental violence .” See Michael A. Hoffman II, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare , 2001.
6 – Bartolo Longo wrote: Before God, man does not have true freedom of conscience, freedom of worship, and freedom of thought, as we understand them today—that is, the ability to choose a religion and a cult according to his understanding; but only the freedom of the children of God, as Saint Paul says, that is, the freedom to forsake the error and allurements of the world in order to run freely to Heaven. To affirm, therefore, that man has the right before God to think and believe in religion as he pleases is a mistake . Cf. Bartolo Longo, San Domenico e l’Inquisizione al Tribunale della Ragione e della Storia , Valle de Pompeya, Escuela Editorial Bartolo Longo, 1888.
7 – Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person (or group) makes another person doubt their perception of reality, memory, or sanity, with the aim of controlling, weakening, or destabilizing the victim.
8 – There can be no true obedience if those who hold positions of authority in the Hierarchy demand to be obeyed, yet at the same time disobey God, who is the guarantor and the very source of Authority. Nor can there be legitimate authority if those who exercise it in God’s name do not in turn submit to His supreme Authority.
9 – Augustin Lémann, L’Antichrist , Marietti, 1919, p. 53. “ The second champion of Christian truth against the Antichrist will be a phalanx of Doctors raised up by God in these times of trial. […] This phalanx of Doctors will receive, for the defense and consolation of the good, a greater understanding of our Sacred Scriptures .” Cf. https://www.rassegnastampa-totustuus.it/cattolica/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/LANTICRISTO-A-Lemann.pdf . Canon Augustin Lémann, a French Jew, converted to Catholicism along with his brother Joseph. Having become friends of Pius IX, they both served as consultants to the First Vatican Council.
10 – Saint Athanasius, Epistolæ festales , Letter XXIX, in Coll. Selecta SS. Eccl. Patrum , edited by Caillaud and Guillon, vol. 32, pp. 411-412.