So, Cardinal Cupich has decided to honor pro-abortion Senator Dick Durbin. The chancery office says that they are honoring him for things other than his support for abortion, but that’s like honoring Bill Cosby for the wonderful things he did other than his mistreatment of women. No one would accept that. The obvious conclusion would be that you just don’t care about the mistreatment of women – or at least not as much as you should.
But there should be no real mystery about what the Cardinal has done. He is like the unfaithful steward in Luke 16 who, realizing that he is soon to be out of a job, does some favors for his master’s debtors to gain their favor after his dismissal. You still want to be invited to the good parties and hang with the people with money and influence. And it’s another good example of “synodality.” You don’t really need to talk to anyone else; you don’t consult or even listen to anyone else, even your fellow bishops; you just command what you, the imperious cleric, desire.
But this is all too obvious. What makes it possible is a broader cultural problem.
I heard recently that the pro-choice governor of New Mexico went to a Catholic campus where she proudly announced herself as a “pro-choice Catholic.” This isn’t something unknown or entirely unusual. There are dozens of politicians who proudly call themselves “pro-choice Catholics.”
So, although I wasn’t startled by this announcement, it did make me wonder. What if she had shown up on a Catholic campus and proudly announced, “I am a pro-segregation Catholic” or “I am an anti-racial integration Catholic”? What would the organizers have done?
Would they have ignored the comment? Would they have smilingly had their pictures taken next to her and posted on the Internet? Or would there have been some objections? Do you suppose someone might have said something like: “Yeah, you know, that thing you say you are. That doesn’t exist.”
It is, of course, likely that our self-proclaimed “pro-segregation Catholic” would be offended by this and say: “How dare you judge me and my Catholic faith.” But we wouldn’t be judging this person’s soul or her faith. We would merely be pointing out that you can no more be a “pro-choice Catholic” than you can be a “non-Trinitarian Catholic” or a “pro-Arian Catholic.”
If we were to allow the term “Catholic” to be used this way, the term would mean nothing. All categories “define” a group that includes certain things and excludes others – or the category is meaningless.
Continue reading at The Catholic Thing
Related Posts
- WATCH: Fr. McTeigue On Cardinal Cupich
- Durbin Says He Was Moved by ‘Support’ from Pope Leo
- WATCH: The Durbin-Cupich Controversy
- Reactions To Pope Leo’s Comments On DurbinGATE
- Pope Leo on the Durbin Award: Wrong and Irrelevant
- Durbin Gives Cupich An Out
- Pope Leo Fails To Condemn Durbin Lifetime Achievement Award
- TAKE ACTION: Tell Your Bishop ‘Silence Is Complicity’ In Cardinal Cupich’s Durbin Scandal
- #10: Archbishop Naumann Accuses Cardinal Cupich of ‘Pastoral Neglect’ for Honoring Pro-Abortion Senator
- WATCH: Bishop Paprocki Discusses The Durbin Honor Controversy
- What Might St. Augustine Say About Cardinal Cupich?
- Silent Shepherds, Forsaken Lambs
- #9: Bishop James Johnston Condemns Cupich’s Planned Durbin Award
- Bishop Kemme Urges Cupich To Withdraw Durbin Award
- And Bishop Olson Makes 7: Urges Cardinal Cupich To Withdraw Durbin Invitation
- Bishop Wall Joins in Condemnation Of Award For Dick Durbin
- WATCH: Bishop Strickland and Taylor Marshall Discuss Durbin Award Controversy
- Bishop Ricken Joins Call For Cupich To Cancel Durbin Award
- Bishop Paprocki Doubles-Down In His Public Correction of Cardinal Cupich
- Bishop Conley Joins Call For Cupich To Abandon Award For Dick Durbin
