Trump’s broadside landed because Leo and his American cardinals have spent months behaving less like shepherds than immigration lobbyists, pacifist pundits, and Democratic-adjacent moral scolds.
Donald Trump’s blast at Leo XIV felt jarring only to people who have spent the last year pretending not to see what was already happening. CBS introduced its own recent segment by saying the American pontiff had become “increasingly outspoken against certain policies of the American president,” and the April 12 interview with Cardinals McElroy, Tobin, and Cupich openly revolved around opposition to the Iran war and to mass deportation. A few days earlier, the Vatican’s own public bulletin showed that Leo had formally received David M. Axelrod in audience on April 9.
A pope who chooses to speak and stage-manage his public profile this way cannot then clutch his pearls when a head of state answers back in political language. Once the white cassock starts functioning like a pressure instrument in American disputes, the deference that ordinarily surrounds the office begins to evaporate. Trump did not create that problem. Leo did.
The real scandal was the spectacle of three American cardinals on national television sounding like a clerical roundtable for the liberal managerial class. Tobin defended his earlier description of ICE as a “lawless organization” and said officers “hide their identities to terrify people.” McElroy declared the Iran war “not a just war.” He also said Spanish Mass attendance in Washington had fallen 30 percent because “it’s all fear.” Cupich denounced the administration’s conduct as “sickening” and suggested Catholics did not really vote for what they were getting. The whole segment was framed around their opposition to mass deportation and the war with Iran.
And there you have it. The men closest to Leo in the American hierarchy were not speaking like pastors trying to form consciences in light of perennial principles, but public antagonists of one administration in particular. That is why Trump’s reply resonated. It was a counterpunch against a political operation that had stopped pretending it was anything else.
Leo’s pattern of selective outrage is exactly why so many ordinary Catholics see a hierarchy that grows thunderous on border enforcement, delicate on progressive idols, and strangely selective in its moral urgency. The old postconciliar instinct is back in full uniform. Immigration receives the high sacramental register. Criminal justice gets lofty humanitarian prose. War gets instant clerical interventions. Yet the bloodiest enemies of the Church abroad, the corruption of Democratic Catholic politicians at home, and the doctrinal wreckage inside the Church itself somehow never generate the same relentless institutional pressure.
Continue reading at Hiraeth in Exile